Depression Prevention App Pilot: Predicted Risk and Anxiety Fell, but Depression Symptoms Did Not and Few Used It

TL;DR: In a small Spanish pilot, adults at high risk of depression got a personalized prevention plan from their family doctor plus an app. After 3 months their predicted depression risk and anxiety scores fell, but depression symptoms did not, most people barely used the app, and there was no comparison group.

Key Findings

  1. 56 at-risk adults, 6 doctors: 47 (84%) finished the 3-month check.
  2. Low app use: Median of 6 days of use in 3 months.
  3. Predicted risk fell: Chance of major depression in the next year dropped from 35% to 26%.
  4. Anxiety and mood quality of life improved; depression symptoms did not change.
  5. Liked by users: Patients and doctors were satisfied and suggested changes.

Source: PLOS One (2026) | Moreno-Peral et al.

Most depression care starts after someone is already ill. But family doctors often see people who are struggling before depression sets in. Could a quick conversation plus a phone app help those people stay well?

A Spanish research network tested an early version of such a program, called e-predictD, in family practices.

A Risk Score, a 15-Minute Talk and an App

The program builds on an earlier doctor-led approach that had already shown it could prevent some depression. This version added technology:

  • Risk calculator: A validated tool estimated each person’s chance of major depression in the next 12 months.
  • Personal plan: Software suggested modules such as exercise, sleep, social contact, problem-solving and changing unhelpful thoughts.
  • Doctor visit: A 15-minute talk to pick which modules to work on.
  • App: Lessons and tracking for 3 months, with updates to the doctor.

Six family doctors in six Spanish cities enrolled 56 adults without current depression but at moderate-to-high risk. Most were women (73%), average age 40, and many already had anxiety symptoms.

People Barely Used the App

The median person used the app on just 6 days over 3 months, with a range from 1 to 30 days for the middle half. In interviews, people blamed hard log-ins, phone changes, lack of time, and feeling overwhelmed by content, questions and notifications. The most worked-on module was changing unhelpful thoughts.

See also  Major Upper-Limb Amputation Linked to Higher Mental Health Diagnoses

Risk and Anxiety Went Down, Depression Symptoms Did Not

After 3 months, the average predicted chance of major depression in the next year fell from 34.5% to 26.2%. Anxiety scores dropped by about 2 points on a 21-point scale, and mental quality of life rose by about 6.5 points.

Bar chart of predicted 12-month risk of major depression: 34.5% at the start and 26.2% after 3 months of the e-predictD program. Depression symptom scores did not change significantly.
Average predicted risk from the predictD algorithm. There was no comparison group, so the drop cannot be credited to the program.

Depression symptom scores, however, did not improve and edged up slightly (8.8 to 9.6 on a 27-point scale, not significant). Physical quality of life did not change.

No Comparison Group

  • Uncontrolled: Without a comparison group, improvements may reflect natural recovery or regression to the mean.
  • Small sample: 56 people, mostly educated women aged 18 to 55.
  • Motivated doctors: Volunteering family doctors may not represent typical practices.
  • Beta app: An early version with known usability problems.

The App Needs to Be Easier Before a Real Trial

The findings suggest people and doctors like the idea of a personalized prevention plan, but the app has to be simpler and less demanding before it can be fairly tested. Whether e-predictD actually prevents depression can only be answered by a randomized trial.

Citation: DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355675. Moreno-Peral P, Campos-Paíno H, Rodríguez-Morejón A, et al. Toward personalized interventions for preventing depression in primary care: qualitative and quantitative findings from the e-predictD pilot study. PLoS One. 2026.

Study Design: Uncontrolled mixed-methods pilot study in primary care.

Sample Size: 56 patients and 6 family doctors; 47 completed 3-month follow-up; 43 patients interviewed.

Key Statistic: Predicted 12-month depression risk 0.345 to 0.262 (difference −0.082, p = 0.048); PHQ-9 change +0.87 (p = 0.50).

Caveat: No control group; low app engagement; small, selected sample.